Three days ago, in Louisiana, enough evidence of illegal voting was uncovered—such that a state Supreme Court judge completely nullified the results of an election. His rationale was that enough ballots were cast illegally to change the outcome of the race, and therefore, the entire thing just has to be redone.
About three weeks ago, on Nov. 18, there was an election held for sheriff in Caddo Parish—located in the northwestern part of the state. After about 43,000 people voted, the official results showed that the Democrat, Henry Whitehorn, had won the election by a margin of just a single vote.
By law, that slim of a margin requires an automatic recount.
John Nickelson was pushing for this recount to be done by hand; however, the local Board of Elections claimed that a hand recount would take too long, and so instead, a machine recount was conducted. This machine recount discovered three extra votes for both candidates, meaning that the recount still showed the Democrat winning by 1.
However, perhaps smelling something fishy, Mr. Nickelson pursued the case further. And in so doing, he filed a lawsuit over in the district court, seeking to challenge the results.
Watch the video:
🇺🇸 Epoch Times 25¢ Full Access Special Offer: https://ept.ms/RomanSale
Exclusive video on EpochTV:
Jack Smith Demands Twitter Info on All Americans Who Interacted With Trump | Facts Matter
According to a heavily redacted search warrant and other documents released earlier this week, Special Counsel Jack Smith demanded information on Twitter users who liked or retweeted President Trump’s tweets leading up to January 6th.
Twitter ultimately complied.
This means that if you interacted with President Trump’s Twitter account before he got kicked off — well, your name is literally on a list.
Watch the exclusive video 👉 https://bit.ly/3TaF5wp
Comentários